DAIRY SUMMARIES
HILL FARM RESEARCH STATION FIELD DAY
APRIL 6, 1999
HILL FARM RESEARCH STATION
APRIL 6, 1999
FIELD DAY SUMMARY REPORT
COMMODITY: DAIRY
TITLE: Horn
Flies and Mastitis in Dairy Heifers
CONTACT: Dr. Bill Owens,
Microbiologist, Hill Farm Research Station (318) 927-9654
TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Recent
research has shown that the horn fly can and does transmit mastitis among
dairy and beef heifers. As fly numbers increase to between 50 and 100 flies
per animal in the late spring, horn flies attack the teat ends of heifer
mammary glands, causing scab formation and intramammary infection (IMI).
Left unchecked and untreated, IMI can result in permanent damage to developing
heifer mammary gland tissue, resulting in chronic infections and lost milk
production when heifers mature and enter the lactating herd. Aggressive
fly control for heifers is warranted as fly numbers increase in late spring
and early summer.
PROBLEM/TOPIC: Dairy heifers
are the life blood of the dairy. Without a constant supply of top quality
replacement heifers, the dairy can not continue to operate effectively.
In recent years, both dairy and beef heifers have been shown to be at risk
for developing mastitis. Research had shown that as high as 90% of heifers
can harbor mastitis organisms in their mammary glands prior to freshening.
Staphylococcus aureus, a major mastitis pathogen, is among the organisms
found in heifers and can cause permanent damage to developing mammary tissue.
A program of mastitis control and therapy is needed that is tailored specifically
for dairy heifers and their special needs.
ACTION: Studies at the Hill
Farm Research Station have demonstrated the existence of mastitis in heifers,
and therapeutic studies have shown that those infections can be treated
effectively with antibiotics in the third trimester of pregnancy with dry
cow antibiotic products. However, the ideal situation is to prevent infection
so that therapy can be avoided. Previous studies demonstrated that horn
flies were capable of causing these infections, and a trial was conducted
to determine if treatment with an insect growth regulator (IGR) product
could control flies sufficiently to be effective. Dairy heifers were divided
into two groups with one receiving an IGR containing mineral, while the
other group served as an untreated control. Results indicated that the
IGR product could not suppress horn flies sufficiently to prevent scab
formation and S. aureus mastitis in heifers.
IMPACT: Studies on heifer
mastitis have shown this to be a significant problem for the Louisiana
dairy industry and one that needs additional research. Therapy studies
have provided vital information for treating heifer mastitis with antibiotics,
and now studies on the causes of this disease will lead to control measures.
The discovery of the link between horn flies and S. aureus mastitis
gives the dairy farmers a key area on which to focus control efforts. When
horn fly numbers increase above 50 to 100 per animal, dairy farmers need
to begin aggressive fly control measures to help protect their valuable
heifers from this problem. This will also require that dairy farmers keep
a closer eye on heifers and flies. Horn fly numbers can increase dramatically
in just a few days, and damage from fly bites can occur quickly. Heifers
will need close observation for signs of fly problems so control measures
can be implemented. Fly numbers of 50 to 100 per animal were sufficient
to cause a problem, and the IGR product could not suppress flies below
this level.
HILL FARM RESEARCH STATION
APRIL 6, 1999
FIELD DAY SUMMARY REPORT
COMMODITY: DAIRY
TITLE: Teat Dipping: Number
One Management Tool to Prevent Mastitis and Lower SCC
CONTACT: Dr. Stephen C. Nickerson,
Lactational Physiologist, Hill Farm Research Station (318) 927-9654
TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Teat dipping
of cows teats both before and after milking is the best management tool
for controlling mastitis by preventing new intramammary infections and
lowering somatic cell counts. The development of new teat dip products
that provide both extended germicidal activity between milkings as well
as barrier properties when cows are exposed to the environmental pathogens
will help to reduce new mastitis cases during the warm and humid periods
of the year.
PROBLEM / TOPIC: The rate
of new intramammary infection is dependent upon the number of mastitis-causing
bacteria growing at the teat end. The dipping of teats in a germicidal
solution prior to milking (predipping) and after milking (postdipping)
has become the most beneficial management tool for dairymen to reduce the
number of bacteria on teats, and subsequently prevent these organisms from
gaining access to the interior of the udder. The cow is exposed to the
environmental organisms such as Streptococcus uberis and Escherichia
coli during the intermilking period when she is exposed to mud, manure,
and bedding materials. Although teat germicides are effective in removing
the vast majority of mastitis-causing bacteria immediately prior to as
well as after milking, a product is needed to form a thin, impregnable,
bactericidal film over the teat end immediately after machine removal,
which will seal the teat orifice and provide prolonged antibacterial activity.
ACTION: Laboratory and field
experiments were initiated to develop an antibacterial surgical shield
used in human medicine into a product that could serve as a germicidal
barrier for cows teats during lactation. Initially, various formulations
of the product were evaluated in vitro for germicidal activity against
common mastitis-causing bacteria. The most efficacious formulation was
then tested on cows' teats to determine efficacy in killing bacteria on
teat skin. A variety of dyes were added and the one providing most visibility
was chosen to evaluate for persistence on teat skin as well as skin irritability.
A formulation was also developed for nonlactating cows to be applied to
teats at dry-off immediately after the infusion of nonlactating cow antibiotics
as well as once during the prepartum period approximately 1 week prior
to calving. The purpose of this dry period barrier was to augment the beneficial
effect of dry cow therapy and to provide protection during the immediate
prepartum period when the udder is susceptible to infection with environmental
organisms.
IMPACT: Mastitis is the
most important dairy cattle disease because it drastically reduces milk
production. It is estimated that this disease causes production losses
approaching $12 million in the state of Louisiana alone. The level of mastitis
in southeast US dairies, as reflected in somatic cell counts (SCC), is
quite high compared with national figures, which indicate that 85% of dairies
are producing milk with SCC<400,000/ml. In Louisiana, approximately
50% of dairies are producing milk with SCC<400,000/ml. At present, the
legal SCC limit for shipping milk is 750,000/ml; however, regulatory agencies
may reduce this limit to 400,000/ml by 2003. Teat dipping is the most useful
tool for dairymen to use for controlling the devastating losses caused
by mastitis, and improved products are needed to further reduce the infection
level in Louisiana dairies. It is believed that the development of novel
germicidal barrier products will provide further control against environmental
pathogens and help dairymen lower SCC in order to comply with future milk
quality standards.
HILL FARM RESEARCH STATION
APRIL 6, 1999
FIELD DAY SUMMARY REPORT
COMMODITY:
WASTE WATER LAGOONS
TITLE: Lagoons for Dairy,
Swine, Alligator, and Poultry (Egg) Waste and Waste Water
CONTACT:
Mr. Bill Branch, Specialist, Cooperative Extension Service (225) 388-6998
TAKE HOME MESSAGE:
Lagoons or oxidation ponds are frequently used for storage and treatment
of animal waste and waste water from animal feeding operations prior to
land application. Installation cost for a 120 cow dairy herd may be $10,000-$12,000.
Operating and maintenance cost may average $1,000-$2,000 per year including
sludge removal every 4-5 years at a cost of $3,000-$5,000.
PROBLEM/TOPIC:
The 1972 Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly
called the Clean Water Act) identified Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) as a point source of water pollution requiring a permit and prohibiting
discharge of waste water except in the event of a 24 hour, 25 year storm
(in Louisiana this varies from 9-12 inches of rainfall in 24 hours). Louisiana
established a General Permit for CAFOs requiring "no discharge systems"
in 1988 and EPA established a general permit requiring no discharge in
1993. The President's Clean Water Act prohibits waste water discharges
from CAFOs and AFOs (smaller CAFOs). DEQ issued nearly 100 Administrative
Orders, Compliance Orders, or Notices of Violation to dairy farmers in
1998. Producers who refuse to install no-discharge systems are subject
to fines.
ACTION:
(1) Soil probes are used to determine if existing clays are adequate to
minimize leaking. Marginal clays can be recompacted. Acceptable clay can
be hauled into site and compacted. Artificial liners can be used. Leaking
to ground water is a problem that must be dealt with during construction
to insure than an adequate clay liner or other liner exists and remains
intact. (2) Irrigation systems can be designed and operated to remove excess
water for irrigation. Avoiding a discharge is a problem that must be managed
during operation by timely irrigation. (3) Removal of sludge from a dairy
or poultry lagoon is a problem that can be minimized by use of a sediment
trap or solids separation equipment. Sediment traps can be designed, constructed,
and operated to minimize rate of accumulation of sludge in dairy or poultry
lagoons. Solids can be applied to land and recycled through other applications.
(4) Removal of sludge is accomplished with a dredge or agitator/pumping
equipment. Dredges are available to remove sludge with minimal disturbance
of water above sludge layer. Agitators are available to mix lagoon contents
and allow irrigation pumps to remove sludge through irrigation systems.
IMPACT:
Lagoons can be used to store and treat animal waste and waste water with
minimal demand for labor and management, minimal leakage into the ground
water and minimal runoff from irrigated fields. Lagoons should be considered
as one option for managing liquid animal waste and waste water from dairy
parlors and holding areas, hog and alligator barns and poultry waste from
table egg production. Dry litter and manure from broiler or breeder hen
operations, horse stables or any other animal feeding operation that can
be removed mechanically for field application or other forms of recycling
should not be stored in a lagoon.
Revised: April 3, 1999 |